From: Damion de Soto <damion@snapgear.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Wondershaper breaks IPSec tunnels
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:48:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4054FD66.2030904@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4048BDD8.2050201@pcxperience.com>
Hi Jason,
> But isn't that where it would be if I did nothing to it? Only the
> really bad traffic gets put in 1:30, right? BTW, the middle class is
> 1:20, correct?
Yeah, it is. I can't recall exactly why I did that, but it doesn't seem to make
sense now.
Oh, yes I can. I have other filters setup for TOS bits, and wanted to make sure that
no matter what TOS bits the ipsec packets had, they were going into 1:20.
> Nope. Haven't changed those values. Do I want to? I basically want
> any traffic of lower priority to be able to take all the bandwidth as
> long as there is no traffic of a higher priority around, but have it
> give way to higher priority traffic when present.
I guess it depends on whether or not you want delays. I try to keep my ceil values
just a little bit below the max they could hit.
although I guess it's probabaly not really noticable.
> | which means they get set to the rate value, and unless you've changed
> | the way it calculates it's percentage rate values, the sum of the leaf
> | rates can exceed the parent.
> | which i believe can lead to weird and/or bad behaviour.
>
> Hmm. Guess I'll have to look into this more.
yeah, check out "What if sum of child rates is greater than parent rate ?"
on http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/htbfaq.htm
regards
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Damion de Soto - Software Engineer email: damion@snapgear.com
SnapGear - A CyberGuard Company --- ph: +61 7 3435 2809
| Custom Embedded Solutions fax: +61 7 3891 3630
| and Security Appliances web: http://www.snapgear.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--- Free Embedded Linux Distro at http://www.snapgear.org ---
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-15 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-05 17:50 [LARTC] Wondershaper breaks IPSec tunnels Jason A. Pattie
2004-03-11 14:59 ` Jason A. Pattie
2004-03-12 0:20 ` Damion de Soto
2004-03-12 15:55 ` Jason A. Pattie
2004-03-15 0:48 ` Damion de Soto [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4054FD66.2030904@snapgear.com \
--to=damion@snapgear.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox