Re: [LARTC] wondershaper, host *exclusion*?

[Simon Oosthoek <simon.oosthoek@ti-wmc.nl>]

Marc Reichman wrote:

> I will research in the howto, but I must say a lot of the terminology 
> goes over my head.
>
> To summarize, my steps are:
> 1. create a queue with no bw limitations
> 2. create a filter for the 192.168.0.0/24 and point it at that queue.
>
> Correct?

yes, however, now I think about it some more, you probably have a 
similar problem as myself (see my other (double) posting). The problem 
is that you want to shape the traffic in 2 directions, but the ingress 
queue (interface _before_ routing) is less flexible to manage than the 
egress queue (interface _after_ routing).

On the egress side, it's quite easy to add queues and make filters to 
it, but I'm not so sure about the ingress side. It might be possible to 
simply bypass the ingress bandwidth limiting queue for a certain 
ip-range (so you then don't have to add another queue for that). But if 
you want (like I do) to apply different restrictions to certain remote 
addresses, than the default, I don't have answers for that (only 
questions ;-)

Cheers

Simon

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/