From: Ed Wildgoose <lists@wildgooses.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] patch: HTB update for ADSL users
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 17:10:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D5C50D.7090600@wildgooses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40D2D5CB.2000804@wildgooses.com>
> After further investigation I think you need the patch a little more
> like this for PPPoE and the params you gave (Andy do you think this
> looks OK?) Please let me know if this works for you.
Duh, scratch that. I think the original patch will work for PPPoE (give
or take).
Can someone help work out how the heck you calculate the real usage of a
packet over PPPoE? Reading a bit further I get the impression that you
have an 8 byte overhead for PPPoE, then it still travels down an ATM
circuit (just like PPPoA)? Can anyone confirm or deny? I have seen
some reports that you actually have two ethernet frames wrapped inside
each other (which is very inefficient), but I can't see which is right?
If it's the former, then I think the original patch will work well
enough for PPPoE people, it's 2 bytes out, but that shouldn't really
show up.
Can someone please try and report back
Thanks
Ed W
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-20 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-18 11:45 [LARTC] patch: HTB update for ADSL users Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 21:43 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-18 23:00 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-19 0:33 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-19 12:29 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-19 12:54 ` syrius.ml
2004-06-19 13:40 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-20 7:27 ` Jason Boxman
2004-06-20 12:31 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-20 13:16 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-20 16:46 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-20 17:10 ` Ed Wildgoose [this message]
2004-06-21 6:08 ` Jason Boxman
2004-06-21 10:04 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-22 0:38 ` Damion de Soto
2004-06-22 5:15 ` Jason Boxman
2004-06-22 9:54 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-22 10:00 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-22 17:16 ` Jason Boxman
2004-06-22 21:52 ` Jason Boxman
2004-06-23 12:52 ` ThE LinuX_KiD
2004-06-23 14:00 ` Ed Wildgoose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40D5C50D.7090600@wildgooses.com \
--to=lists@wildgooses.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox