Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ed Wildgoose <lists@wildgooses.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] the "cisco vs. Linux" thread
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:48:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40F2B2E0.3000103@wildgooses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040708193300.GA30890@mabeys.dsl.aros.net>


>> Alfie, have you used the Routerboard 230 or 240 products?  Anyone else?
>>
>> Could anyone else recommend other manufacturers of this type of
>> hardware: an embedded system board with * a couple of NICs
>> * PCMCIA
>> * runs linux
>
>
> This one, and its cheaper:
>
> http://www.soekris.com/


Actually, I am really interested in this kind of hardware.  But it's 
actually not really as cheap as it looks.  (Bear in mind I am based in 
the UK so I am looking post-shipping price)

Most of these tiny embeded devices need $20-30 or powersupply, and same 
again for a case, and a bit of RAM...  It looks like around £300 
sterling to me all in.  However, you can often pickup a bottom of the 
range Compaq/HP server for that price... (OK, not as small and neat!)

There are some really nice and neat little boxes, which would be good 
for a mid-priced box where you need the grunt. 

...But for low end hardware it seems hard to beat the Linksys WRT54GS 
which is around £50 GPB from ebuyer....  This gets you 32Mb and a 200Mhz 
processor! (and 2 net cards, a small switch and a wireless radio!)

The "S" model is only starting to arrive in the UK so mine's on 
backorder, but I think it's easily available in the US?

Ed W
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-07-12 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-08 19:33 [LARTC] the "cisco vs. Linux" thread Glen Mabey
2004-07-08 21:38 ` Nicholas Erkert
2004-07-08 21:44 ` Nicholas Erkert
2004-07-09  9:47 ` Jeff Green
2004-07-09 14:35 ` Alfie Viechweg
2004-07-10 22:51 ` Glen Mabey
2004-07-10 23:25 ` Glen Mabey
2004-07-11  0:36 ` Dmitry Golubev
2004-07-11 14:48 ` S Mohan
2004-07-11 17:15 ` James Sneeringer
2004-07-11 18:48 ` José Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
2004-07-12  7:18 ` przemolicc
2004-07-12  8:15 ` Abraham van der Merwe
2004-07-12  8:39 ` przemolicc
2004-07-12  9:33 ` przemolicc
2004-07-12 14:33 ` José Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
2004-07-12 15:48 ` Ed Wildgoose [this message]
2004-07-12 16:01 ` José Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
2004-07-13  7:22 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-07-13 11:49 ` Alfie Viechweg
2004-07-13 13:44 ` Ed Wildgoose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40F2B2E0.3000103@wildgooses.com \
    --to=lists@wildgooses.com \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox