From: Andreas Unterkircher <unki@netshadow.at>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Differentiating between http downloads and interactive
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 09:22:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <435A04D1.2080904@netshadow.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C2DA8EC72BEE0740BC5C7F5E04D4EB5160503A@holly.mtech.gg>
I don't know how you really can differ between them. But I guess easy
way would be using HTB burst.
So the first (small?) packets get a high bandwidth immediately trough
burst settings. If more data is requested,
it will be slown down to defined ceil bandwidth.
Cheers,
Andreas
Paul J. Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve been wondering if anyone has thought of a way to differentiate
> between an established http download and interactive http traffic? I
> would like to give interactive http traffic priority over someone
> downloading large files.
>
> Has anyone any ideas how to detect packets that are part of a download
> like this?
>
> Thanks.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>LARTC mailing list
>LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
>http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
>
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-22 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-22 9:17 [LARTC] Differentiating between http downloads and interactive Paul J. Smith
2005-10-22 9:22 ` Andreas Unterkircher [this message]
2005-10-22 15:23 ` BUCHMULLER Norbert
2005-10-23 3:31 ` Grant Taylor
2005-11-02 16:22 ` [LARTC] Differentiating between http downloads and LinuXKiD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=435A04D1.2080904@netshadow.at \
--to=unki@netshadow.at \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox