Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: DervishD <lartc@dervishd.net>
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl,
	Netfilter Development Mailinglist
	<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [LARTC] MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:01:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <439EB826.3070002@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051213091820.GA1021@DervishD>

DervishD wrote:
>     Hi Salim :)
> 
>  * Salim <salim.si@askey.com.tw> dixit:
> 
>>   I got this problem while trying to shape traffic with iptables MARK and
>>HTB.
>>
>>MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4
>>
>>--set-mark gives "invalid argument" error message.
>>
>>Kernel version is 2.4.29 (some patches from patch o matic applied)
>>Iptables version 1.3.4
>>
>>Intel x86 architecture.
>>
>>I saw this problem discussed in a few places, but the discussions didn't
>>come to a conclusion or solution.
> 
> 
>     You've hit a bug in iptables :( I've notified in the bugzilla but
> I have had no answers. You're building iptables with no shared
> libraries (NO_SHARED_LIBS=1). This means that the code in iptables,
> when loading the "modules" for the matches and targets is taking a
> slightly different code path. The problem is that the MARK target
> has two versions, 0 and 1, and kernel 2.4.x (at least until 31)
> supports only version 0. If you don't use share libraries in
> iptables, both versions are loaded and v1 is used instead of v2.
> Unfortunately, v1 has a bigger data structure than v0 and your kernel
> complaints.

That can't be the reason, all revisions of a single match/target are
in the same object file and the supported revision is (supposed to be)
probed. Salim, can you send a strace of the failing iptables command?
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-13 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-13  7:22 [LARTC] MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4 Salim
2005-12-13  9:18 ` DervishD
2005-12-13 12:01   ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
     [not found]     ` <200512131809.jBDI9lAW028466@usagi.ingate.se>
2005-12-13 20:37       ` DervishD
2005-12-14  0:27       ` Patrick McHardy
2005-12-22  3:29       ` Patrick McHardy
2005-12-14  2:14 ` Salim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=439EB826.3070002@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=lartc@dervishd.net \
    --cc=lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox