From: Diego Cabrero <diego.cabrero@e-attico.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Uplink shapping
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:53:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43B01FFD.7050302@e-attico.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43AFCEF0.2060703@e-attico.net>
Well, i have them isolated, let's say there are two computers conected
by a single ethernet cable and i'm doing trials, so then i will
implement this control over a linux server conected to a DSL router
through ethernet . But firstly it needs to work out over the two
isolated computers, and i guess it is just needed to control the net
board by the router side. Is there anything wrong with this trial
benchmark setting?.
Thanks.
Hammond, Robin-David%KB3IEN escribió:
>
> Im a bit confused. Do you have 2 linux computers ethernetworked to an
> ADSL bridge? an ascii schematic of the network might help us understand.
>
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2005, Diego Cabrero wrote:
>
>> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:07:28 +0100
>> From: Diego Cabrero <diego.cabrero@e-attico.net>
>> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
>> Subject: [LARTC] Uplink shapping
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'm controling the uplink traffic bandwidth between two ethernet
>> linux computers, but it seems like even the download bandwidth
>> gets limited then i've got trouble on that because my intention is
>> shaping the conection on an asymetric way (ADSL). Lately, I'm
>> going crazy, this problem has got me pretty worried and i'm not
>> figuring out at all, the reasons why this weird bug happens.
>>
>> I'd appreciate some help guys. thanks
>>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-26 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-26 11:07 [LARTC] Uplink shapping Diego Cabrero
2005-12-26 16:53 ` Diego Cabrero [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43B01FFD.7050302@e-attico.net \
--to=diego.cabrero@e-attico.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox