Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mohan Sundaram <smohan@gmail.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] New hardware
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:17:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44EC0C61.7010505@vsnl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1156175178.44e9d54a18bd1@www.inbox.lv>

Marek Kierdelewicz wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
>> I used a SunFire x2100 which has 2 Ghz Opteron and PCI-Xpress slot
>> into which I plugged in a dual port gigE Intel PCI-Xpress card.
> 
> What was the software configuration of this host? What kernel
> have you used for the test (compiled for x86 or amd64; dual-core
> aware sheduler or not).
> 
stock x86 32 bit kernel 2.4.20. No dual core optimisations.
> Out of the curiosity ... dual port nic generates one interrupt or two
> per port? I asume the first is more probable. This leads to another
> question - has interrupt been balanced between cores? 
I'm unaware of how it was configured.
> 
>> Got a raw forwarding performance of 800Kpps for 64B packets. This
>> beat a CISCO 3845 which gave 600Kpps.
> 
> Thanks for the input :).
> 
> Right now my production border router (BGP+some firewall rules+some QoS,
> vlans @ P4 3GHz Linux 2.6, 2xBroadcom PCI-X, 1xIntel E1000 PCI-X) is 91%
> saturated (CPU) at peek hours and during the time it forwards 344,8Kpps
> with avg. packet sized 69 bytes.
> 
The Opteron was 100% utilised at 800Kpps for 64B pkts. I could do 
bi-directional line rate on gigE for 512/1500B pkts (approx 500/164Kpps) 
  with 65%/25% cpu utilisation
> I'll try to determine raw forwarding performance when box goes out
> of production env, so we'll have a clear comparison picture.
> 
> regards,

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-08-23  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-21 15:46 [LARTC] New hardware Jurijs Petrovs
2006-08-21 16:16 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2006-08-22  2:21 ` Mohan Sundaram
2006-08-23  7:51 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2006-08-23  8:17 ` Mohan Sundaram [this message]
2006-08-23  8:21 ` Mohan Sundaram

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44EC0C61.7010505@vsnl.com \
    --to=smohan@gmail.com \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox