From: "Taylor, Grant" <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Patch to allow for the ATM "cell tax"
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:59:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45771328.60801@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1141284603.10264.168.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube>
Russell Stuart wrote:
> The following patch to tc allows it to perform an exact
> ATM / ADSL rate calculation. It adds one extra keyword
> to the "tc class add htb ..." command line: "atm". There
> isn't a lot of spare bits hanging around to record this,
> so the patch adds the feature at the expense of always
> forcing the "overhead" parameter to be even.
>
> With the patch, these commands will generate a correct
> rate table for:
>
> PPPoA + VC/Mux: tc class add htb ... overhead 10 atm
> PPPoA + VC/LLC: tc class add htb ... overhead 18 atm
> PPPoE + VC/Mux: tc class add htb ... overhead 34 atm
> PPPoE + VC/LLC: tc class add htb ... overhead 42 atm
What would be the appropriate parameters for an RFC 1483 / 2684 LLC Encapsulation or VC Multiplexing? Would the values above adjusted for the removal of PPPoX compensate?
Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-06 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-02 7:30 [LARTC] Patch to allow for the ATM "cell tax" Russell Stuart
2006-03-02 13:37 ` Markus Schulz
2006-03-02 13:51 ` Markus Schulz
2006-03-02 15:49 ` Andy Furniss
2006-03-02 19:54 ` Adam James
2006-03-02 21:35 ` Andy Furniss
2006-03-02 22:18 ` Russell Stuart
2006-03-02 22:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-03-02 22:45 ` Jason Boxman
2006-03-02 23:44 ` Russell Stuart
2006-03-03 0:27 ` Jason Boxman
2006-03-03 0:43 ` Russell Stuart
2006-03-03 1:23 ` Markus Schulz
2006-03-03 1:49 ` Markus Schulz
2006-03-03 1:54 ` Russell Stuart
2006-03-03 2:23 ` Markus Schulz
2006-03-03 2:27 ` gentoo
2006-03-03 13:43 ` Andreas Hasenack
2006-03-03 16:18 ` Jason Boxman
2006-03-03 16:45 ` Andreas Hasenack
2006-03-03 18:45 ` Jason Boxman
2006-03-03 19:34 ` Andreas Hasenack
2006-03-05 19:27 ` Andy Furniss
2006-03-06 17:26 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2006-03-13 18:09 ` Jason Boxman
2006-03-14 0:34 ` Russell Stuart
2006-03-14 0:49 ` Jason Boxman
2006-03-14 1:26 ` Russell Stuart
2006-03-14 2:10 ` Adam James
2006-03-14 13:14 ` Andy Furniss
2006-03-14 13:25 ` Andy Furniss
2006-03-14 23:28 ` Russell Stuart
2006-03-15 0:29 ` Andy Furniss
2006-12-06 18:59 ` Taylor, Grant [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45771328.60801@riverviewtech.net \
--to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox