From: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] Re: Shaping incoming traffic on the other interface
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:23:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87u0xjtma8.fsf@stark.xeocode.com> (raw)
Matteo Brusa <miagi@tiscali.it> writes:
> Hi,
> I have a typical configuration for my firewall/gateway box: single network
> card, with a pppoe connection to the DSL modem.
> I'm already successfully shaping the uplink (how come that the
> wondershaper.htb doesn't use the ceil parameter? It should implement bandwidth
> borrowing!) but i found the ingress policy a little bit rough.
> I'd like to keep the traffic categories i have in the uplink: ssh, web and batch.
> The goal is to discard packets of the lowest class first, then the middle, and so on.
> I've implemented a simmetrical downlink version of the uplink shaping on eth0,
> the other interface. However, i get this error (warning?) in the log:
> pppoe[29606]: send (sendPacket): No buffer space available
Hm, I just did exactly the same thing here. I don't see this.
What do your filters look like?
I do see
HTB: dequeue bug (8), report it please !
which I think is because i have too low burst/cburst settings.
My settings currently look like:
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate ${BW}kbit burst 8k cburst 8k
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate ${BW80}kbit ceil ${BW}kbit burst 8k cburst 8k prio 1
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate ${BW10}kbit ceil ${BW}kbit burst 4k cburst 1k prio 2
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate ${BW10}kbit ceil ${BW}kbit burst 2k cburst 1k prio 3
(where ${BWxx} = xx% of the total bandwidth I want on that link)
--
greg
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2004-06-10 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-10 16:23 Greg Stark [this message]
2004-06-10 16:54 ` [LARTC] Re: Shaping incoming traffic on the other interface Matteo Brusa
2004-06-10 20:07 ` Greg Stark
2004-06-10 20:30 ` Jason Boxman
2004-06-10 20:33 ` Andreas Klauer
2004-06-11 5:13 ` Greg Stark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87u0xjtma8.fsf@stark.xeocode.com \
--to=gsstark@mit.edu \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox