From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@netaktiv.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:56:40 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] MARKing according to both net. interfaces?
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-100409018109867@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-100401832718215@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-100401832718215@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:43:51AM +0200,
 Oskar Andreasson <blueflux@koffein.net> wrote 
 a message of 79 lines which said:

> > is accepted but ipchains -v shows that no packets are marked. I

It was a typo, I meant iptables.

> Why the hell are you involving ipchains into this?=) ipchains !iptables.

I know, it was just a typo, I used only iptables. Same question.

> OUTPUT is broken. Use PREROUTING. 

Did you try by yourself? 


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/