From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Tackaberry Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 21:21:40 +0000 Subject: [LARTC] Re: is HTB better than CBQ Message-Id: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org > Hmm, well, I'm trying very hard to understand CBQ because I need to give a > lecture about it. And I am not succeeding. HTB currently has some You don't know how relieved I am to hear you say that. :) I too am having problems getting a solid handle on CBQ. And here I thought I was just being dense. :) > Right now, if your link sharing needs can be handled by CBQ.init (also > mentioned in the HOWTO), by all means use it. I suspect CBQ may scale better CBQ.init looks good, and might do the job, but I don't want to use it on principle because it's basically a black box. I tried to read and understand the script, but that's difficult because I don't understand CBQ. So if I can do everything "from first principles" with HTB, I'd be much happier. I do plan to try it next week. I'll share my results with everyone. Regards, Jason. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/