From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Devera Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 09:12:46 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Shaping incoming traffic? Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Exactly. Ingres is needed when packet end its trip inside Linux box (so there is no queue to place it to). devik On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Kristian Hoffmann wrote: > Am I correct in assuming that you only need to use the Ingres qdisc if > you're not the router between two networks (namely the internet and your > customers). We have CBQ/TBF setup for our incoming traffic (internet to > customer). Can the same rules be applied in reverse for outgoing traffic > (customer to internet)? > > Thanks, > > Kristian Hoffmann > PC-InTOUCH/FireToWire System Administrator > khoff@pc-intouch.com > --- > > On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Martin Devera wrote: > > > It is nerly FAQ. You can use Ingres qdisc to do it and attach > > policers here. > > It would be nice to be able to attach every qdisc to incoming interface > > but it is not possible. There is always problem - when packet already > > hitted your box why do you want to drop/delay it ? > > You should to do it on outgoing side of link to your box .. > > > > When you are router (not app box) then you can shape both directions. > > On your virtual-host note. I already did patch (called IMQ) which > > implements virtual inteface allowing to attach single qdisc to multiple > > outgoing devices. > > It should be relatively easy to extend it to catch incoming packets > > too - only there is no time to do it. > > > > best regards, devik > > > > On 19 Nov 2001, Manfred Bartz wrote: > > > > > > > > I would like to differentiate incoming traffic streams to guarantee > > > minimum bandwidth to some services. However, as per the > > > Adv-Routing-HOWTO it appears that only outgoing traffic can be shaped. > > > Is this correct or is there a way of shaping incoming traffic? > > > > > > The problem could possibly be overcome if there is a way of routing > > > traffic through a virtual host. Any tips on how to go about that? > > > > > > -- > > > Manfred > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/ > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/ > > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/