Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cédric Rivard" <cedric.rivard@nerim.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: further CBQ/tc documentation ds9a.nl/lartc/manpages
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 01:12:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-100794684523497@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-100785524509147@msgid-missing>

On Sunday 9 December 2001 22:41, jamal wrote:
> > It is a bit sad that one cannot queue packets in ingress. Would be quite
> > useful to make ingress shaping behave more sane than what can be acheived
> > with the queueless filter police mechanism.
>
> Look at the definition of work vs non-work conserving; This is design
> intent. If you look at the datapath, it is totaly meaningless to put
> queues at ingress, for routing when they are being queued on ingress as
> well.

Wouldn't it make sense to set a non-work conserving interface on ingress and 
a work conserving interface on egress ?
That would be handy to share bandwidth between outgoing packets through 
different interfaces.

Cedric

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-12-10  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-08 20:43 [LARTC] Re: further CBQ/tc documentation ds9a.nl/lartc/manpages jamal
2001-12-08 21:30 ` bert hubert
2001-12-08 21:56 ` jamal
2001-12-08 23:08 ` bert hubert
2001-12-08 23:29 ` jamal
2001-12-08 23:30 ` jamal
2001-12-08 23:45 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2001-12-08 23:54 ` bert hubert
2001-12-09  1:19 ` jamal
2001-12-09  1:35 ` bert hubert
2001-12-09  2:11 ` jamal
2001-12-09  2:30 ` jamal
2001-12-09 11:38 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2001-12-09 14:40 ` bert hubert
2001-12-09 14:49 ` jamal
2001-12-09 15:01 ` jamal
2001-12-09 15:49 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2001-12-09 16:45 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2001-12-09 21:41 ` jamal
2001-12-09 22:33 ` Michael T. Babcock
2001-12-09 22:36 ` Michael T. Babcock
2001-12-10  1:12 ` Cédric Rivard [this message]
2001-12-10  7:53 ` Don Cohen
2001-12-10  8:38 ` Martin Devera
2001-12-10  8:41 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2001-12-10  9:59 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2001-12-10 11:35 ` Martin Devera
2001-12-10 11:59 ` Martin Devera
2001-12-10 12:00 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2001-12-10 12:14 ` bert hubert
2001-12-10 12:25 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2001-12-10 12:52 ` Martin Devera
2001-12-10 13:29 ` jamal
2001-12-10 13:40 ` Martin Devera
2001-12-10 13:42 ` Jim Fleming
2001-12-10 13:52 ` Michael T. Babcock
2001-12-10 13:54 ` Michael T. Babcock
2001-12-10 13:56 ` Gerry Creager N5JXS
2001-12-10 13:58 ` Michael T. Babcock
2001-12-10 14:02 ` Martin Devera
2001-12-10 14:51 ` Jim Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-100794684523497@msgid-missing \
    --to=cedric.rivard@nerim.net \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox