From: Amit Kucheria <amitk@ittc.ku.edu>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] CBQ inaccuracy
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 07:50:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-100822988013280@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-100820629913063@msgid-missing>
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, bert hubert wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 07:17:43PM -0600, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > I have found CBQ to be very inaccurate (as others on the list)
> >
> > I have created a structure as follow
> >
> > Root (10mbit)
> > |
> > CBQ class (bandwidth=1mbit, rate\x10mbit)
> > |
> > CBQ qdisc (bandwidth=1mbit)
>
> Um, this doesn't make sense. I keep repeating this to posters here, SHOW
> YOUR CONFIGURATION! Don't just draw pictures - your CBQ commandlines may not
> do what you think they do.
My apologies. Here's the script
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BANDWIDTHºndwidth 10Mbit
LIMITBW=1Mbit
# Root CBQ qdisc 1:
$TC qdisc add $DEVICE root handle 1: cbq $BANDWIDTH $AVPKT
# Root CBQ class 1:1
# This class rate limits everyting to 1Mbit
$TC class add $DEVICE parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq $BANDWIDTH rate $LIMITBW
\
maxburst 100 $AVPKT allot 1514 weight 100Kbit prio 1 bounded isolated
# Filter packet from the 2 sources
$TC filter add $DEVICE parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src
$SRC1 flowid 1:1
$TC filter add $DEVICE parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src
$SRC2 flowid 1:1
# CBQ qdisc 2:0
$TC qdisc add $DEVICE parent 1:1 handle 2:0 cbq bandwidth $LIMITBW $AVPKT
allot 1514
-------------------------------------------------------
--
The statement below is true.
The statement above is false.
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Amit Kucheria
EECS Grad. Research Assistant
University of Kansas @ Lawrence
(R)+1-(785)-830 8521 ||| (O)+1-(785)-864 7774
____________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-13 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-13 1:17 [LARTC] CBQ inaccuracy Amit Kucheria
2001-12-13 7:14 ` bert hubert
2001-12-13 7:50 ` Amit Kucheria [this message]
2001-12-13 8:20 ` Stef Coene
2001-12-13 8:49 ` bert hubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-100822988013280@msgid-missing \
--to=amitk@ittc.ku.edu \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox