From: Anton Tinchev <atl@top.bg>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic shaping an apartment building
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 07:09:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-100952337405392@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-100944590905204@msgid-missing>
Hi,
I recomend you to use HTB.
It's prety simple and easy to configure
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/htbman.htm
> Hi,
>
> I live in a rural community where adsl and cable is not widely available. I
> correctly have an option of using adsl or cable at my location. Ten miles
> away my friends apartment building has no option of cable or adsl. I set-up
> a wireless link between my friends apartment building and my house. It
> works great for him and me and the adsl company doesn't care because they
> don't cover the area and we aren't going over our bandwidth allotments.
>
> Old setup:
>
> ADSL (dynamic)
> |
> NAT linux box ( inside 192.168.1.0) (486s)
> |
> My internal network (192.168.1.0) (Just a small network really!)
> |
> Wireless radio (192.168.1.0)
> |
> Wireless radio (192.168.1.0)
> |
> His internal network (192.168.1.0)
>
> We have been using this set-up for few months and we share the bandwidth and
> he paid the costs of wireless radios. His apartment got wind what we are
> doing and want a connection. To make a long story short we want to run a
> cable to the phone room and then up to each apartment so logistically we can
> do it. However, I am not interested in giving everyone in this apartment a
> full connection speed connection to the internet. I don't know them. :-)
>
> I have set-up a redhat 7.2 box /w 2.4.7 kernel all the stuff I need seems to
> be in built-in the kernel. Reading the list archives I setup a proxy-arp
> bridge and its been working fine.
>
> ADSL (dynamic)
> |
> NAT linux box ( inside 192.168.1.0) (486s)
> |
> My internal network (192.168.1.0) (Just a small network really!)
> |
> Redhat 7.2 box 2.4.7 (Proxy-arp with 2 nics)
> |
> Wireless radio (192.168.1.0)
> |
> Wireless radio (192.168.1.0)
> |
> His internal network (192.168.1.0)
>
> I had look at http://www.docum.org/ and http://ds9a.nl/lartc/. I just not
> sure what I need to do next I have read the documents at the latter and it
> seems confusing to me. What I would like to do is give almost everyone in
> the apartment a 64k connection with exception of my friends machines (384k)
> and apartment manager machine (384k).
>
> Allen Armstrong
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-28 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-27 9:25 [LARTC] Traffic shaping an apartment building Allen Armstrong
2001-12-27 10:19 ` Stef Coene
2001-12-28 6:41 ` Allen Armstrong
2001-12-28 7:09 ` Anton Tinchev [this message]
2001-12-28 9:01 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-100952337405392@msgid-missing \
--to=atl@top.bg \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox