Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Gustafson <bobgus@mcs.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Per-connection routing for multiple uplinks/providers
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 06:01:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-101893695108357@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-101890143014670@msgid-missing>

>On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Bob Gustafson wrote:
>
>> What I would like to do is cleanly move packets out to the Internet over
>> two (maybe 3) separate interfaces, utilizing all of the bandwidth, and
>> avoiding snags.
>
>[snip, lots of nice interesting wishes]
>
>> Does such a beast exist? Is it possible to build with current
>> ip/tc/netfilter technology?  I am running a near stock RH 7.2 at the
>> moment. Each ISP line is going through a separate (proprietary/black-box)
>> firewall/router and then into the RH7.2 box.
>
>QoS and routing are basically independent of each other. Orthogonal,
>mathematicians would say. Furthermore, there *is* in fact a patch floating
>around somewhere on the internet that flushes the route cache after every
>packet... that might help. I've never used it, as I don't trust it to keep
>TCP connections intact, but still, it might prove useful.
>
>You'll have to do some digging on your own though...

I was afraid of that. But this list was the first place to dig, yes?

>
>Doei, Arthur. (Oh, and it is Arthur van Leeuwen. The surname is
>               'van Leeuwen'. Kinda like in 'Ludwig van Beethoven')

Ahh, learn something every day. The van *isn't* just like a middle name then.
(I was pretty careful about the spelling of Leeuwen though :-)

Thanks much for the feedback

BobG
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-04-16  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-15 20:08 [LARTC] Per-connection routing for multiple uplinks/providers ?? Bob Gustafson
2002-04-15 21:55 ` [LARTC] Per-connection routing for multiple uplinks/providers Arthur van Leeuwen
2002-04-16  6:01 ` Bob Gustafson [this message]
2002-04-16  6:56 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
2002-04-16 11:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2002-04-16 13:38 ` Mihai RUSU
2002-04-16 13:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2002-04-16 14:14 ` Mihai RUSU
2002-04-16 20:01 ` Bob Gustafson
2002-04-16 20:26 ` Don Cohen
2002-04-16 21:38 ` Bob Gustafson
2002-04-28 15:27 ` [LARTC] Per-connection routing for multiple uplinks/providers ?? mikee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-101893695108357@msgid-missing \
    --to=bobgus@mcs.net \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox