Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arthur van Leeuwen <arthurvl@sci.kun.nl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] "Bug" in howto 4.2.1 Split access and other advice
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 18:13:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-102589286401985@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-102589034132084@msgid-missing>

On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Ard van Breemen wrote:

> Hi,
> http://lartc.org/HOWTO//cvs/2.4routing/html/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
> I am not sure who wrote this part or what it was based upon, but
> since I am working a lot longer now with ip rules, I think I want
> to add some stuff:

The stuff that is in the HOWTO was designed and tested back in 1999.
Oh, and I am the author. :)

> The example 4.2.1 refers to the picture above, and does a plain
> ip rule add from .... table ....
> The problem with the exampe is that if you connect from the
> inside (local network) to your if1 ip or if2 ip, that in this
> example the replies to the local-network are going out if1 or
> if2... That is not what you want.

True. That is indeed a bug. Never saw it in actual practice though: you
*should*not* connect to the external IP addresses of your router from
the internal network... for various security reasons and such. But you are
right.

[snip]

Whoa, that was large. I'm not sure I entirely follow you though.
The *point* of the extra routing tables is that they take precedence
over the default routing tables...

Doei, Arthur.

-- 
  /\    / |      arthurvl@sci.kun.nl      | Work like you don't need the money
 /__\  /  | A friend is someone with whom | Love like you have never been hurt
/    \/__ | you can dare to be yourself   | Dance like there's nobody watching

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-05 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-05 17:31 [LARTC] "Bug" in howto 4.2.1 Split access and other advice Ard van Breemen
2002-07-05 18:13 ` Arthur van Leeuwen [this message]
2002-07-05 18:25 ` Laurens van Alphen
2002-07-05 18:39 ` Stef Coene
2002-07-05 18:45 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
2002-07-05 18:47 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
2002-07-05 18:58 ` Stef Coene
2002-07-05 19:05 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
2002-07-05 19:27 ` Stef Coene
2002-07-05 19:39 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
2002-07-05 20:31 ` Julian Anastasov
2002-07-05 21:43 ` Stef Coene
2002-07-08 11:22 ` Ard van Breemen
2002-07-08 11:54 ` Ard van Breemen
2002-07-08 12:15 ` Julian Anastasov
2002-07-08 12:28 ` S Mohan
2002-07-08 13:50 ` 'Ard van Breemen'

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-102589286401985@msgid-missing \
    --to=arthurvl@sci.kun.nl \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox