From: "Gabor Csuri" <csucsu@dunasor.hu>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [LARTC] traffic control based on the downloaded bytes
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 19:49:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-103661211521677@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-103657740713718@msgid-missing>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm new on this list. I'm the admin of the server in our house.
> > We have a 768k/128k DSL line.
> > There are 11 flats using this bandwith without any control.
> > Some of them are "high donwloader" and the browsing speed is
> decreasing a
> > lot when the downloaders are waken up. :(
> > I have an idea how the downloaders and the browsers can use
> this bandwith
> > without any conflict.
> > My question is: Is it possible with iproute2 ?
> > My idea: I define a bandwith to downloaders (maybe 512k).
> > If any of the downloading thread exceed a limit (maybe 4Mbyte) it passed
> > into the 512k bandwith.
> > How can I do this trick?
>
> Go to the LARTC website and look at the WonderShaper script. It
> does pretty
> much what you want. Just set the port list to what you consider
> "downloading" (probably ftp and ftpdata). I use this to keep my downloads
> from interfering with my roommate's gaming.
Hi Kenneth,
I've taken a look to wondershaper and I think this is a half-solution for
me.
I can set up priority by port-number and other properties but I think I
can't separate packet which is a part of a 70KB gif image (part of a web
page) or it's a part of a 800MB CD image coming from a website also. This is
my problem.
Thanks, Gabor.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-06 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-06 10:09 [LARTC] traffic control based on the downloaded bytes Gabor Csuri
2002-11-06 17:04 ` Stef Coene
2002-11-06 19:49 ` Gabor Csuri [this message]
2002-11-06 20:06 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-103661211521677@msgid-missing \
--to=csucsu@dunasor.hu \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox