From: Homer Parker <hparker@homershut.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Multiple classes
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 17:39:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-103893766225478@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-103889506715109@msgid-missing>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2194 bytes --]
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 11:29:00 +0100 Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
wrote....
> > different things, all failing, some worse than others. The end result
> > is to throttle back 126 IP's individually. I've read so much over the
> > last few days, I've almost confused myself, and probably have ;)
> > Thanks for any and all help!
> >
> > tc qdisc add dev $DEV0 root handle 1: htb default 20
> >
> > tc class add dev $DEV0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 128kbit \
> > burst 6k
> >
> > tc class add dev $DEV0 parent 1:1 classid 2: htb rate 128kbit \
> > burst 6k
> All class attached to the same qdisc have the same major number.
> Numbering of classes and qdiscs : <major nuber>:<minor numer>.
> 2: is a valid name for a qdisc, but not for a class.
Ok, I've tried grasping what you are telling me here, let's see how far
off I am now... From the example in 9.5.5.1:
# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 30
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 6mbit burst 15k
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 5mbit burst 15k
# tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 3mbit ceil 6mbit
# burst 15k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate 1kbit
# ceil 6mbit burst 15k
The author then recommends SFQ for beneath these classes:
# tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
# tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:20 handle 20: sfq perturb 10
# tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:30 handle 30: sfq perturb 10
Add the filters which direct traffic to the right classes:
# U32="tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32"
# $U32 match ip dport 80 0xffff flowid 1:10
# $U32 match ip sport 25 0xffff flowid 1:20
If I started with something similar to this, then I would just start
building under the 10:, 20:, 30: for the different IP's? If that's the
case, then I would send all of x.x.x.x to 10:1, and then have the
different rates and priorities within th 10:1 block? Am I on the right
track, or completely out in left field?
> #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
I can never find anyone in there, lots of names, no responses :(
---
Homer Parker
http://www.homershut.net
telnet://bbs.homershut.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-03 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-03 5:49 [LARTC] Multiple classes Homer Parker
2002-12-03 10:29 ` Stef Coene
2002-12-03 17:39 ` Homer Parker [this message]
2002-12-03 21:03 ` Stef Coene
2002-12-04 10:08 ` Homer Parker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-103893766225478@msgid-missing \
--to=hparker@homershut.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox