From: "James Ma" <jma@nsicomm.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] u32 and netfilter
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 19:01:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-103902852419421@msgid-missing> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 466 bytes --]
Hi, All,
My understanding is u32 filter is very powerful filter and could do anything about IP header filtering, then why do we sometimes use netfilering in IPtables? One advantege I guess is in netfilering, there is usage counter? Are there other advantges using netfilter (such as delay, flexibility)? What is the disadvantages to us Netfilter?
In summary, what are the considerations to select u32 or netfilter as classifier for QoS?
Thanks,
James
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1197 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2002-12-04 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-04 19:01 James Ma [this message]
2002-12-05 17:11 ` [LARTC] u32 and netfilter Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-103902852419421@msgid-missing \
--to=jma@nsicomm.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox