From: Abraham van der Merwe <abz@frogfoot.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB and theory
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 22:18:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-103947246114318@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-103945416224487@msgid-missing>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2044 bytes --]
Hi Stef!
> > I'll let HTB to automatically compute the values for 'burst' and
> > 'cburst'. The problem is elsewhere. What are the correct values for
> > 'rate' and 'ceil' of 11:2 class in this case? In fact, total value of
> > 'ceil's from all sub-classes exceeds 5000Kbit, so there are moments when
> > the bandwidth that comes from my ISP is bigger than guaranteed bandwidth.
> > Is there some kind a theory that says how to establish the values of
> > 'rate's and 'ceil's from the parent and its sub-classes?
> There are some rules : ceil of child <= ceil of parent, sum (child rates) <=
> rate of parent .... You don't have to follow this rules, but the final
> shaping result can be strange.
> See the faq page on www.docum.org.
What would be nice is if you could document what happens when
a) child ceil > parent ceil
b) child rate > parent ceil
c) child ceil > parent rate
d) child rate > parent rate
How does this influence the shaping results and the shaping of other
classes? I've actually asked a similar question before: If you have
1:1
/ \
/ \
1:2 1:3
/|\ \------
/ | \ \ \
1:4 1:5 1:6 1:7 1:8
if 1:7 and 1:8 respects the rate/ceil of 1:3 and 1:3 respects the rate/ceil
of 1:1, but 1:4 does not respect the rate/ceil of 1:2 and 1:2 respects the
rate/ceil of 1:1, does the shaping of 1:3 work as normal and only those
classes under 1:2 are adversely affected or not? from your previous answer,
it seems that the classes under 1:3 would not be affected, but I would love
to know why. what happens with 1:4 requests some bandwidth which 1:2 does
not have...
--
Regards
Abraham
NEWARK has been REZONED!! DES MOINES has been REZONED!!
___________________________________________________
Abraham vd Merwe [ZR1BBQ] - Frogfoot Networks
P.O. Box 3472, Matieland, Stellenbosch, 7602
Cell: +27 82 565 4451 Http: http://www.frogfoot.net/
Email: abz@frogfoot.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-09 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-09 17:14 [LARTC] HTB and theory Catalin Bucur
2002-12-09 18:22 ` Stef Coene
2002-12-09 20:27 ` Catalin Bucur
2002-12-09 21:22 ` Stef Coene
2002-12-09 21:45 ` Catalin Bucur
2002-12-09 22:18 ` Abraham van der Merwe [this message]
2002-12-10 12:33 ` Stef Coene
2002-12-10 12:40 ` Stef Coene
2002-12-10 13:28 ` Abraham van der Merwe
2002-12-10 21:23 ` Stef Coene
2002-12-12 8:36 ` Abraham van der Merwe
2002-12-12 10:49 ` Stef Coene
2002-12-12 11:19 ` Abraham van der Merwe
2002-12-12 18:32 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-103947246114318@msgid-missing \
--to=abz@frogfoot.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox