From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:43:53 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] WonderShaper on LAN link kills to-host speed Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 17 December 2002 23:15, Kenneth Porter wrote: > I tried installing the WonderShaper on my internal link, mostly to get the > SFQ installed. I set uplink and downlink to 100000 to match the link speed > and changed the bandwidth on the cbq line to 100mbit. This killed transfer > speed *to* the box, knocking it from 30-40 Mbps down to about 800 kbps. > Commenting out just the ingress control restored the speed. > > What about the ingress policer would do that? I'm not sure, but the policer can calculate the rate in the class in 2 ways. And maybe your CPU can't handle the calculations. What CPU do you have and what's the load on the sstem? > Here's the effective line after shell expansions: > > tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \ > 0.0.0.0/0 police rate 100000kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/