Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Capouch <brianc@palaver.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] Using HTB as an ISP "provisioning engine"
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:51:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104033114505084@msgid-missing> (raw)

I am new to shaping but not to routing; forgive me if this request is 
inappropriate for this list.

I am a very small ISP and would like to use HTB to enforce contractual 
bandwidth limits on my customers.  I am trying to think through one 
aspect of this that is vexing me.  I'm sure it's no great secret that 
many ISPs oversell their bandwidth, and in our case we have a 
combination of accounts that total approximately 2.2Mbs on our feed, 
which is 1.2Mbs. (Concentrating right now on our download stream)

How could something like this be accomodated?  The documentation says 
that the total bandwidth allocations of a set of subclasses should total 
that assigned to the class.

But my understanding is that if I bump up the bandwidth on the primary 
class to a value greater than my actual bandwidth, then I'm going to be 
filling up queues at the upstream ISP and negatively affecting my 
performance.

I'm sure there is something I'm missing, but I've discussed this with a 
couple of fellow network engineers and neither was able to posit how 
such thing might work, although they both said they were sure that it is 
a common scenario.

Thanks.

B.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

             reply	other threads:[~2002-12-19 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-19 20:51 Brian Capouch [this message]
2002-12-19 21:10 ` [LARTC] Using HTB as an ISP "provisioning engine" Stef Coene
2002-12-20  5:24 ` S Mohan
2002-12-20 11:07 ` Daniel Egger
2002-12-23 16:30 ` raptor
2002-12-23 16:53 ` Stef Coene

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104033114505084@msgid-missing \
    --to=brianc@palaver.net \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox