From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 12:02:15 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] ingress policing Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 lartc@e-apollo.lv wrote: > > I am interested in policing outgoing traffic. (client--->[eth2][traffic shaper > box][eth0]--->The Internet). > > What about ingress qdisc? Can i relay on it, say if it's used for 300 users? I > tested it on myself, but i have no idea how it is going to work with 300 users. > While testing on myself speed was shaped accuratly. It's accuracy doesn't depend on the number of users/ips/... > > What about IMQ? As i understand it creates virtual interface through which i can > route cerrtain adresses, but what if i have 300 of them?! As with the ingress policer, IMQ doesn't care much about the number of users/ip as long as you don't want to create an IMQ device for each of these users (in fact some people are running setups with >300 imqs, but i don't know how well its working). If you don't need features of "advanced qdiscs" like htb but only want to slow down i would not use imq but the ingress policer since it saves you one extra queue. Bye, Patrick _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/