Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] How HTB treats priorities?
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 23:23:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104120428116624@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-104110872106366@msgid-missing>

> >Remaining bandwidth inside class B is distributed first to class D, then E
> >and then F and is limited by ceiling parameter . Right???
>       yes, what you have said is right.
Confirmed.  Lowest prio classes are allowed to send first.

> >Class A has available bandwidth. Rules for guaranteed rates for classes
> >D,E,F,G,H,I are fulfilled. So available bandwidth has to
> >be distributed between class B and C equaly (assuming B and C has the same
> >rate and prio). Is remaining bandwidth distributed to classes D and G, and
> >then to classes E and H and at the end to classes F and I???
Yes.

>   I remember having read something about the "rate" parameter of a
> parent HTB class.  I think it was that the "rate" parameter isn't used,
> only the "ceil" parameter (of a parent HTB class) is important.  Check
> the list archive and the HTB home page because I'm not sure.
Nor the rate, nor the ceil are respected if the child class can send.  So if B 
end C can send the remaining bandwidth, they will.  Even if the parent ceil 
is not permitting it.

>   If what I have written is true, there is a possibility that bandwidth
> is not distributed equally between classes B and C.
Indeed.  This can be true IF class B and C have different rates.  But I did 
some tests and it seems to be that remaining bandwidth is splitted 50-50 and 
according to the rates.  Strange.  I will test it further tomorrow.  But the 
prio of the parent is respected.  So the parent with the lowest prio get all 
remaining bandwidth.

> >What if C and B have different rates?
> >
> >Is prio parameter taken into account when htb tries to meet guaranteed
> >rate rules?
>
>    I think the "prio" parameter is only used after all classes have
> reached their guaranteed minimum rate, to allow the user to create
> classes that will borrow bandwidth over other classes.
Yep.

> >What happens when sum of guaranteed rates of children class is bigger than
> >guaranteed rate of parent (rate parameter is overbooked) and all of
> >classes are requesting maximum bandwidth? Are classes with lower prio
> >given bandwidth first?
>
>     There are rules that you should respect when creating classes.
>  Check the FAQ on the HTB home site.
And I have some more on the faq page on www.docum.org

> >Are packets classfied to class D and G sent first?
>
>    No, unless classes D and G haven't reached their guaranteed minimum
> rate.
>
> >What will happen if prio of class B is 0 and class C is 3? I assume
> >remaining bandwidth is first distributed to class B and to its children.
> >Right???
>
>     Same answer regarding parent HTB classes.  I'm not sure.
All remaining bandwidth goes to B.

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-12-29 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-28 20:53 [LARTC] How HTB treats priorities? ISC Robert Kryczało
2002-12-29  5:01 ` Stephane Ouellette
2002-12-29 23:23 ` Stef Coene [this message]
2002-12-30 22:35 ` ISC Robert Kryczało
2002-12-30 23:37 ` Stef Coene
2003-01-02 16:26 ` Homer Parker
2003-01-02 17:56 ` ISC Robert Kryczało
2003-01-02 18:03 ` ISC Robert Kryczało
2003-01-02 21:57 ` Stef Coene
2003-01-04 20:21 ` ISC Robert Kryczało
2003-01-05 17:42 ` Stef Coene
2003-01-06 18:54 ` ISC Robert Kryczało
2003-01-06 19:32 ` Stef Coene

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104120428116624@msgid-missing \
    --to=stef.coene@docum.org \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox