From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:58:52 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] 3c905 or intel with 82550 chip? for htb + bridge + (u32 & fw filters) Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 02 January 2003 18:32, Victor Cassar wrote: > Hi: > > finally i=B4m working with htb + bridge on 2.4.20 to > shape ip traffic, and i want to build a system but i=B4m > not up2date with these specific driver issues > > mi primary need is to shape small bandwidths 128 or > 256 > > are there any diferences between these 2 options? > Since i need more granularity in the queuing > behavior..i dont know how relevant this decision can > be.. The chip doesn't mather. All shaping is done in the kernel so in software. Stef --=20 stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/