From: Victor Cassar <victorcassar@yahoo.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] 3c905 or intel with 82550 chip? for htb + bridge + (u32 & fw filters)
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 23:13:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104154927106998@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-104152880716719@msgid-missing>
Yea my gut want intels i´m just making sure...
some times i read diferent things in linux or bsd
routing projects about that some cards being better
than others, issues about the tulip chip (dec), 3coms,
etc
and since i had some problems in the past with earlier
version of 2.x having multiple 3c905, i´m asking know
agree with you and thanks for the reply
--- "William L. Thomson Jr."
<support@obsidian-studios.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 13:58, Stef Coene wrote:
> >
> > The chip doesn't mather. All shaping is done in
> the kernel so in software.
> >
>
> With that said, I use and recommend Intel nics. I
> used to use some 3com
> ones, but they were crap.
>
> I personally like the 82557-9, mostly the 9's since
> they are tiny.
>
> But basically any Intel card that is supported by
> the e100 driver. The
> e100 driver for Intel cards is my favorite. Intel is
> always releasing
> new versions. Not to mention the IANS software that
> is also available.
>
> My two cents, Intel all the way.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> William L. Thomson Jr.
> Support Group
> Obsidian-Studios Inc.
> 439 Amber Way
> Petaluma, Ca. 94952
> Phone 707.766.9509
> Fax 707.766.8989
> http://www.obsidian-studios.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:
http://lartc.org/
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-02 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-02 17:32 [LARTC] 3c905 or intel with 82550 chip? for htb + bridge + (u32 & fw filters) Victor Cassar
2003-01-02 21:58 ` Stef Coene
2003-01-02 22:30 ` [LARTC] 3c905 or intel with 82550 chip? for htb + bridge + William L. Thomson Jr.
2003-01-02 23:13 ` Victor Cassar [this message]
2003-01-03 17:17 ` [LARTC] 3c905 or intel with 82550 chip? for htb + bridge + (u32 & fw filters) Victor Cassar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-03 2:07 John Bäckstrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104154927106998@msgid-missing \
--to=victorcassar@yahoo.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox