Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Evans <pevans@catholic.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] double gateway - new thread
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 23:58:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104397124523448@msgid-missing> (raw)

I've been subbing this list for a couple of months now, knowing this day would 
come :-)

I too am trying to do an equalize/next hop for 2 adsl lines. At the moment 
though I am testing with 1 2MB adsl modem and an ether connection to a switch 
from a second 2MB line.

I am doing it from the *outside* via ssh, which makes it a little more 
difficult, since when I mess up I lose access until I can get someone to 
restart the network without my changes...

I began by using the example from lartc.org, combined with a cron to undo my 
changes every half hour, but moved to following this page from sysadmin 
magazine:
http://www.samag.com/documents/sam0201h/

For some reason I got a better sense of what I was trying to do from it, plus 
it included a section on just where to place the new rules into the system 
scripts. It did not say just where to place the section for ifup-routes 
though.

I think I've got it pretty close, but since I just locked myself out again... 

It's a mandrake 9.0 box and I didn't see where to prevent a default route from 
being set when it brings up ppp0 on the adsl line. I sort of hoped that my 
default routes would get set first and force the other to fail with the 
Exists error. Since I couldn't find it, I don't know in what order it gets 
run. I think that's where I messed up, but I can't get back in to read the 
logs right now.

Also, the above article uses ip to route to the lan, and I had 
intended/understood that I would masquerade to it later. Which is the correct 
approach then? I will want to move on to tc when I finally get this part 
working.

from the article:

advanced eth0 10.0.0.0/24 via 10.0.0.1 table 1
advanced eth0 10.0.0.0/24 via 10.0.0.1 table 2
advanced eth1 0/0 via 63.89.102.1 table 1
advanced eth2 0/0 via 65.3.17.1 table 2

Where eth0 is their lan and eth1/2 are isp. They have a new section in 
ifup-routes grepping a file named static-routes for '^advanced'.

-- 
Regards, Paul Evans


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

             reply	other threads:[~2003-01-30 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-30 23:58 Paul Evans [this message]
2003-01-31  0:33 ` [LARTC] double gateway - new thread William L. Thomson Jr.
2003-01-31  0:46 ` John Bak
2003-01-31  4:39 ` William L. Thomson Jr.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104397124523448@msgid-missing \
    --to=pevans@catholic.org \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox