From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Abraham van der Merwe Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 15:23:22 +0000 Subject: [LARTC] ESFQ - optimal parameters? MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z" Message-Id: List-Id: To: lartc@vger.kernel.org --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! Have anyone experimented with ESFQ yet? I'd like to know what the optimal depth/divisor/perturb settings are for X kilobits/per/second. For example, once could calculate the optimal limit parameter (bitrate (bps= ) * latency / (mtu * 1000)), but what should depth/divisor be? Also, what is the optimal perturb value in general for SFQ / ESFQ? --=20 Regards Abraham There are times when truth is stranger than fiction and lunch time is one of them. ___________________________________________________ Abraham vd Merwe [ZR1BBQ] - Frogfoot Networks P.O. Box 3472, Matieland, Stellenbosch, 7602 Cell: +27 82 565 4451 Http: http://www.frogfoot.net/ Email: abz@frogfoot.net --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE+Polq0jJV70h31dERAgGHAKCX4SJuZoVBhgFHAVkXtgGd9dTduQCfXRJn n20lw8RmLrrCggnPvF5wK/4= =JPdn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z-- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/