From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] quantum value for voip
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:37:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104516170929877@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-104509464522905@msgid-missing>
On Thursday 13 February 2003 17:00, Victor Cassar wrote:
> Thanks Stef
>
> Yep i missunderstood the quantum concept (it´s clear
> now), but since my voip class was configured with
> enough bw this doesn´t matter
>
> Reading more on docum.org, i find hte possible cause
> of the delays i was using sfq (128p queue) on the leaf
> i removed sfq from the voip class
>
> I will try also with other disciplines.. like tbf
> just to have a deeper understanding of queuing in real
> life applications
Tbf will not change nything. Htb is acutally a tbf but with classes.
> Are there any recomendation on which queuing
> discipline to use with voip?
> (my stats show 100 bytes per packet average in voip)
Why not a simple fifo? You can adapt the size of it from the command line.
> i´m doing more tests now and i´ll re re-read the full
> lartc. doc
Keep us informed.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-13 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-12 23:59 [LARTC] quantum value for voip Victor Cassar
2003-02-13 7:34 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-13 16:00 ` Victor Cassar
2003-02-13 18:37 ` Stef Coene [this message]
2003-02-14 0:13 ` Mathieu Deziel
2003-02-14 0:18 ` Mathieu Deziel
2003-02-14 8:01 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-14 13:38 ` Mathieu Deziel
2003-02-15 2:39 ` Victor Cassar
2003-02-17 13:05 ` Mathieu Deziel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104516170929877@msgid-missing \
--to=stef.coene@docum.org \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox