From: "Intercom - Roberto Ravetti" <rravetti@itc.com.ar>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] cbq vs htb?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 17:17:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105303007513533@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105301464526654@msgid-missing>
What I have told you, about the problem of ping delay with CBQ, is just with
RF Conection..
Bye
Roberto.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stef Coene" <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: "Griem, Hans T" <hans.t.griem@boeing.com>
Cc: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] cbq vs htb?
> On Thursday 15 May 2003 20:13, Griem, Hans T wrote:
> > Hello Cef or...,
> >
> > Thanks for your input. Yes I am trying to figure out where/what/when
these
> > obscure CBQ options add value (ie., to conclude whether I should
eliminate
> > cbq from my "toolchest"). So I wonder since cbq uses the physical link
per
> > your response is it better suited to bandwidth control for (rf)
> > applications with fluctuating link rates, etc?
> In contrary. The bandwidth option in cbq should match the real physical
link
> bandwidth. I don't know how this is done on rf networks.
> Comared this to htb. Htb uses a token bucket system to control the rate
of
> the data. This has nothing to do with the physical link. It just send
data
> at a certain controlled rate.
>
> I'm not a specialist in this. But I don't think I'm telling any lies :)
>
> Stef
>
> --
>
> stef.coene@docum.org
> "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
> http://www.docum.org/
> #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-15 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-15 16:01 [LARTC] cbq vs htb? Griem, Hans T
2003-05-15 17:00 ` Stef Coene
2003-05-15 17:17 ` Intercom - Roberto Ravetti [this message]
2003-05-15 18:13 ` Griem, Hans T
2003-05-15 18:26 ` Stef Coene
2003-05-22 21:11 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105303007513533@msgid-missing \
--to=rravetti@itc.com.ar \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox