From: Raj Mathur <raju@linux-delhi.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Proportionate sharing of excess bandwidth: still no go
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:34:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105975148917653@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105974782513096@msgid-missing>
Hi Martin,
>>>>> "Martin" = Martin A Brown <mabrown-lartc@securepipe.com> writes:
Raj> : I tried the recommendations of people on this list
Raj> and tried tweaking : the QUANTUM values in my HTB
Raj> configuration, but still have the problem : of the excess
Raj> bandwidth not being shared proportionately between :
Raj> different pools.
Martin> Could you tell us which interface is your "transmit to the
Martin> Internet" interface?
Martin> I speculate that you are shaping your upload bandwidth,
Martin> not your download bandwidth. If my speculation is
Martin> correct, perhaps you could try using the same traffic
Martin> control configuration on both devices (eth0 ? and eth1).
Martin> What happens then?
This is for the `internal' (LAN) interface, eth1, which shapes
incoming traffic. I'm running similar commands on the `external'
(WAN) interface, eth0, for shaping outbound traffic. Not too
concerned about aspect, so omitted in the interests of brevity.
Raj> : Am enclosing the set of tc commands I'm using to generate
Raj> the pools. : The values have been desperately tweaked for
Raj> some 4 hours, so some of : them may look a bit funny.
Martin> Your quantum setting seems awfully high to me. I'd
Martin> recommend removing any reference to quantum before trying
Martin> again.
Originally it was something like 1500, 3000 and 6000 :) Like I said,
I was fooling around with the values to see if it made any difference
at all -- as you can guess, it didn't.
Martin> [snip]
Regards,
-- Raju
--
Raj Mathur raju@kandalaya.org http://kandalaya.org/
GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F
It is the mind that moves
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-01 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-01 14:34 [LARTC] Proportionate sharing of excess bandwidth: still no go Raj Mathur
2003-08-01 15:13 ` Martin A. Brown
2003-08-01 15:34 ` Raj Mathur [this message]
2003-08-01 15:41 ` Stef Coene
2003-08-01 15:57 ` Raj Mathur
2003-08-02 8:08 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105975148917653@msgid-missing \
--to=raju@linux-delhi.org \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox