Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB for multiple users, good or bad approach?
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 17:28:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105975897726738@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105974896414405@msgid-missing>

Am Friday 01 August 2003 17:39 schrieb Stef Coene:

> > The script I've come up with so far can be found there:
> > http://www.metamorpher.de/files/ipshape.sh

I updated the script.

> Some remarks.  You define a burst on your 1:1 class.  You
> don't need this. 

I bet there are lots of thinks which I don't need.
I'm not familiar with any of these parameters, mainly I'm just
more or less playing around with it. I removed this. 

> And make sure that the sum of the rate of
> child classes = rate of parent class.

I tried that. I noticed that I was wrong at one spot, but
it should fit now, unless there are some rounding errors
(which, hopefully, do not have such a bad impact on things).

> Also, limit all bandwidth too less then your link 
> bandwidth so YOU are the botleneck

How much less would you recommend?
I subbed 5% of link bandwith for now.

> Using different prio's for you htb classes can be tricky. 
> Remove the prio parameters untill you understand what the
> different prio's does.

Yes, now that I read the FAQ on your page, I guess my
prio values were all to high. They're all between 0-7 now,
I hope thats better. If I understand the prio right, I need
them, because I want the interactive connections to take
as much bandwidth as they can get, even if the users are
quite active themselves too... I also raised their rates.
I reckon, though, that these settings still require lots
of tweaking...

> For the quantum problem, see the faq pages on www.docum.org

I read your FAQ before, and I'm sure I still don't understand
it fully. I use some (mostly randomly chosen) quantum values
now, just to make these messages vanish... hopefully they make
any sense...

Thank you very much for your feedback!

--
Andreas Klauer <andreas.klauer@metamorpher.de>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-08-01 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-01 14:41 [LARTC] HTB for multiple users, good or bad approach? Andreas Klauer
2003-08-01 15:39 ` Stef Coene
2003-08-01 17:28 ` Andreas Klauer [this message]
2003-08-02 20:52 ` Stef Coene

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105975897726738@msgid-missing \
    --to=andreas.klauer@metamorpher.de \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox