From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB for multiple users, good or bad approach?
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 17:28:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105975897726738@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105974896414405@msgid-missing>
Am Friday 01 August 2003 17:39 schrieb Stef Coene:
> > The script I've come up with so far can be found there:
> > http://www.metamorpher.de/files/ipshape.sh
I updated the script.
> Some remarks. You define a burst on your 1:1 class. You
> don't need this.
I bet there are lots of thinks which I don't need.
I'm not familiar with any of these parameters, mainly I'm just
more or less playing around with it. I removed this.
> And make sure that the sum of the rate of
> child classes = rate of parent class.
I tried that. I noticed that I was wrong at one spot, but
it should fit now, unless there are some rounding errors
(which, hopefully, do not have such a bad impact on things).
> Also, limit all bandwidth too less then your link
> bandwidth so YOU are the botleneck
How much less would you recommend?
I subbed 5% of link bandwith for now.
> Using different prio's for you htb classes can be tricky.
> Remove the prio parameters untill you understand what the
> different prio's does.
Yes, now that I read the FAQ on your page, I guess my
prio values were all to high. They're all between 0-7 now,
I hope thats better. If I understand the prio right, I need
them, because I want the interactive connections to take
as much bandwidth as they can get, even if the users are
quite active themselves too... I also raised their rates.
I reckon, though, that these settings still require lots
of tweaking...
> For the quantum problem, see the faq pages on www.docum.org
I read your FAQ before, and I'm sure I still don't understand
it fully. I use some (mostly randomly chosen) quantum values
now, just to make these messages vanish... hopefully they make
any sense...
Thank you very much for your feedback!
--
Andreas Klauer <andreas.klauer@metamorpher.de>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-01 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-01 14:41 [LARTC] HTB for multiple users, good or bad approach? Andreas Klauer
2003-08-01 15:39 ` Stef Coene
2003-08-01 17:28 ` Andreas Klauer [this message]
2003-08-02 20:52 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105975897726738@msgid-missing \
--to=andreas.klauer@metamorpher.de \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox