From: "Curtis V. Schleich" <cvslist@ccaonline.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] QOS problems switching from CBQ to HTB.
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:00:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106365971619593@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106364615002966@msgid-missing>
Trying 4000 right now, I'll try 1500 after I have a chance to see if 4000
makes any difference. I have put new commands and stats (which I will
update periodically over the next few hours) at the
http://wireless.ccaonline.com/lartc/ site. On initial examination it does
not seem to be making any significant difference. I've still got very laggy
ping times, which I did not have when we were using CBQ. During the HTB
research, I did discover that my CBQ setup was probably weird. I had a
class for each user directly off the root, and the total rates FAR exceeded
the available bandwidth. So from what I read it was probably pretty
whacked, but I always seemed to have stable pings under 10ms. These are all
over the map (or graph as the case may be).
Anything else??
Thanks!!
CVS
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stef Coene" <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: "Curtis V. Schleich" <cvslist@ccaonline.com>; <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] QOS problems switching from CBQ to HTB.
> On Monday 15 September 2003 19:14, Curtis V. Schleich wrote:
> > Hello all! So as not to inundate the entire list with a huge email, I
have
> > put together a web page that
> > explains my situation and problem in detail. Here is a quick summary:
> >
> > Internet
> >
> >
> >
> > CCAonline Router (Cisco)
> >
> >
> >
> > (eth0)
> > Master CCAonline AP
> > HTB Bandwidth control
> > (wlan0)
> >
> >
> >
> > =========> > / / / /|\ \ \ \
> > / / / / | \ \ \ \
> > / / / / | \ \ \ \
> > (Lots of Wireless Clients) | \
> > / \
> > / \
> > AP1 AP2
> > / \
> > / \
> > ==== ===> > / /|\ \ / /|\ \
> > / / | \ \ / / | \ \
> > Other Wireless Other Wireless
> > Clients Clients
> Can you try to add "quantum 1500" or maybe 4000 to each class?
>
> Stef
>
> --
> stef.coene@docum.org
> "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
> http://www.docum.org/
> #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-15 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-15 17:14 [LARTC] QOS problems switching from CBQ to HTB Curtis V. Schleich
2003-09-15 18:22 ` Curtis V. Schleich
2003-09-15 20:18 ` Stef Coene
2003-09-15 21:00 ` Curtis V. Schleich [this message]
2003-09-15 21:49 ` Steve Wright
2003-09-15 22:00 ` Curtis V. Schleich
2003-09-16 18:38 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106365971619593@msgid-missing \
--to=cvslist@ccaonline.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox