From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Sequence and Default port
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:25:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106425546918318@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106423050719876@msgid-missing>
On Monday 22 September 2003 13:25, Raghuveer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have following queries :--
>
> 1. For indicating any default IP we are placing 0/0 as src or dst in the
> tc script, similarly what can I use for default port....?. This is the
> scenario when rules are framed based on ports. For example, For a
> firewall with eth0(WAN), eth1(LAN) and eth2(DMZ), Iam doing CBQ outgoing
> (egress) traffic shaping at eth0 interface for public hosted servers
> located at eth2(DMZ) based on ports(80 for http etc). Now I want to
> frame a rule for remaining traffic (default) allocating remaining
> bandwidth(total rate is 512Kbits, 256 Kbits provided to the hosted
> servers, rest 256KBits is for other traffic). My rules for identifying
> the hosted servers is based entirely on src port. Hence what rule should
> I frame for all other traffic coming from eth1(LAN).
There is no such thing as default port. But I don't understand why you need
this. I think it can be done with the dst/src parameter.
> 2. Is the rule sequence play any role, like if there is any conflict
> between the rules then the last rule will be given preference. what
> happens exactly if there is any conflict...?
The first rule that's a match wil be followed. Order is based on prio and the
order they are entered.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-22 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-22 11:37 [LARTC] Sequence and Default port Raghuveer
2003-09-22 18:25 ` Stef Coene [this message]
2003-09-23 6:08 ` Raghuveer
2003-09-23 19:46 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106425546918318@msgid-missing \
--to=stef.coene@docum.org \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox