From: Catalin BOIE <util@deuroconsult.ro>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] filter
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 05:08:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106567619621486@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106565321305922@msgid-missing>
Don't worry. It's tc fault (or maybe kernel).
The filters are once in the kernel but are showed no_of_prios_used times.
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Victor wrote:
> The difrence betwen these 2 configurations is only the prio parameter from
> the second filter, from each configutation.
> (tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 5 protocol ip u32 ht 800:: match ip
> src 80.97.24.0/24 hashkey mask 0x000000ff at 12 link 2:)
>
> Configuration 1
>
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 500Kbit prio 1
> quantum 2000
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:201 htb rate 4Kbit ceil 500Kbit
> prio 0 quantum 2000
> tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 1 handle 2: protocol ip u32 divisor 256
> tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 5 protocol ip u32 ht 800:: match ip
> src 80.97.24.0/24 hashkey mask 0x000000ff at 12 link 2:
> tc filter add dev eth0 prio 1 protocol ip u32 ht 2:01 match ip src
> 80.97.24.1 flowid 1:201
>
> Configuration 2
>
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 500Kbit prio 1
> quantum 2000
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:201 htb rate 4Kbit ceil 500Kbit
> prio 0 quantum 2000
> tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 1 handle 2: protocol ip u32 divisor 256
> tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 1 protocol ip u32 ht 800:: match ip
> src 80.97.24.0/24 hashkey mask 0x000000ff at 12 link 2:
> tc filter add dev eth0 prio 1 protocol ip u32 ht 2:01 match ip src
> 80.97.24.1 flowid 1:201
>
> Configuration 1
> tc filter show dev eth1
> shows the next lines:
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 801: ht divisor 1
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 2: ht divisor 256
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 2:1:800 order 2048 key ht 2 bkt
> 1 flowid 1:201
> match 50611801/ffffffff at 12
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800
> bkt 0 link 2:
> match 50611800/ffffff00 at 12
> hash mask 000000ff at 12
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 801: ht divisor 1
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 2: ht divisor 256
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 2:1:800 order 2048 key ht 2 bkt
> 1 flowid 1:201
> match 50611801/ffffffff at 12
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 5 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800
> bkt 0 link 2:
> match 50611800/ffffff00 at 12
> hash mask 000000ff at 12
>
>
>
> Configuration 1
> tc filter show dev eth1
> shows the next lines:
>
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 2: ht divisor 256
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 2:1:800 order 2048 key ht 2 bkt
> 1 flowid 1:201
> match 50611801/ffffffff at 12
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800
> bkt 0 link 2:
> match 50611800/ffffff00 at 12
> hash mask 000000ff at 12
>
> Why the configutaion1 has many filters than configuration2?
> How can the prio paramenter influence this?
> What is the range for the prio parameter in the filter context?
> Thank you.
>
> Victor
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> This email was sent using SquirrelMail.
> "Webmail for nuts!"
> http://squirrelmail.org/
>
>
> Random Thought:
> --------------
> Integrity has no need for rules.
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
---
Catalin(ux) BOIE
catab@deuroconsult.ro
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-09 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-08 22:46 [LARTC] filter Victor
2003-10-09 5:08 ` Catalin BOIE [this message]
2003-10-09 16:40 ` Stef Coene
2003-10-10 5:09 ` Catalin BOIE
2003-10-10 19:49 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106567619621486@msgid-missing \
--to=util@deuroconsult.ro \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox