From: Ira Abramov <lists-lartc@ira.abramov.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] same address range, different interfaces
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:32:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106934244610704@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106924600531191@msgid-missing>
Hey there, I wish people threw in more ideas...
what I tried now is this: my problem is that I need to route the packet
on the way out according to the original destination, but the only place
it will NAT the destination is before routing, so what I did waqs mark
packets with the netfilter MARK target and then have iproute2's code
select the routing table based on the fwmark. it's covoluted but should
work in theory:
1) MARK the incoming packet in table mangle on chain PREROUTING and
OUTPUT
2) add a rule to the RPDB to map the NATsource based on the source and
iface it came by, and then it goes to table main be default
(problem! it should be a map based on the destination!)
3) open a new table (same ID as the MARK for conveniance) and add NAT to
destination back to its real address (thus losing the original
target, all I have left is the MARK to route with)
4) packet goes back to traverse the RPDB, where I catch it with another,
lower priority rule than (2) based on the fwmark, sending it to the
table I opened in (3) where I have a route to the right interface for
the real address.
now this would work in theory if I could do (2) as NAT and then traverse
the RPDB again without sending it to a specific lookup table, is this
making sense? or can I send it to the local table and it will traverse
the rest of the RPDB when it gives up? am I missing another way of doing
this without a routing table per interface?
Any and all help is appreciated in advance,
Thanks,
Ira.
--
The little prince
Ira Abramov
http://ira.abramov.org/email/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-20 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-19 12:38 [LARTC] same address range, different interfaces Ira Abramov
2003-11-19 15:44 ` Ira Abramov
2003-11-20 9:44 ` Ira Abramov
2003-11-20 15:32 ` Ira Abramov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106934244610704@msgid-missing \
--to=lists-lartc@ira.abramov.org \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox