From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "lartc@manchotnetworks.net" Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:02:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] howto mark packets Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org hi cezar, why not use the TOS mark -- it is carried in the packet's tcp header ... you can only have 8 types/marks however ... cheers charles On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 17:03, Cezar Atanasiu wrote: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:43:40 +0100 > Eric Leblond wrote: >=20 > > Le lun 24/11/2003 =E0 16:16, Cezar Atanasiu a =E9crit : > > > Hi folks, > > > The questions :=20 > > >=20 > > > 1. can that be done ? > >=20 > > not that way, fw mark are lost when you leave the computer >=20 > I know, that is why I asked. >=20 > >=20 > > > 2. if the answer to the first q. is yes, can that be done w/o > > > patching > > > the kernel on the first router w/ experimental patches ? > >=20 > > you can do that in a "capillotract=E9" way (such an idea) by using > > tunnels(gre or ipip) and doing some iproute2 an A do push packet in a > > tunnel corresponding to their mark and have B route by interface. >=20 > Hmm, that would become too complicated. There is no other way ?=20 >=20 > >=20 > > BR, > > --=20 > > Eric Leblond > > NuFW, Now User Filtering Works (http://www.nufw.org) > >=20 >=20 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/