From: "Artūras Šlajus" <x11@h2o.pieva.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] Fair queueing: SFQ vs TBF
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:04:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106983872325105@msgid-missing> (raw)
Hello,
I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with
several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number?
Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this
job, but it's only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine's 2.4.22.
So what is better: SFQ or TBF?
--
Artūras Šlajus
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2003-11-26 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-26 9:04 Artūras Šlajus [this message]
2003-11-26 11:24 ` [LARTC] Fair queueing: SFQ vs TBF Laradji nacer
2003-12-17 0:59 ` jzeeff
2003-12-17 2:17 ` Steen Suder, privat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106983872325105@msgid-missing \
--to=x11@h2o.pieva.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox