RE: [LARTC] $100 USD to the first person that can provide the rules/scripts that will solve the QOS

From: "Greg Freeman" <gfreeman@westoncs.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [LARTC] $100 USD to the first person that can provide the rules/scripts that will solve the QOS
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 20:45:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-107057058330391@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-107047454124998@msgid-missing>

Good guess,  10.0.0.7 is actually the VoIP phone system, which can
handle multiple calls.  10.0.1.20-22 are actually IP phones

I just pasted your other changes and was about to apply them.  I will
try it first, then the below and let you know the results.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stef Coene [mailto:stef.coene@docum.org] 
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Greg Freeman
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] $100 USD to the first person that can provide the
rules/scripts that will solve the QOS latency & bandwidth allocation
issue !!!!

On Thursday 04 December 2003 21:24, Greg Freeman wrote:
> Stef,
> The current set of rules I have in it are as follows:
>
>
> tc qdisc add dev ipsec0 root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev

> ipsec0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 600kbit ceil 640kbit burst 2k tc

> class add dev ipsec0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 240kbit tc class

> add dev ipsec0 parent 1:2 classid 1:20 htb rate 400kbit tc filter add 
> dev ipsec0 parent 1:0 prio 0 protocol ip handle 10 fw flowid 1:10 tc 
> filter add dev ipsec0 parent 1:0 prio 0 protocol ip handle 20 fw 
> flowid 1:20 iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p ALL -j MARK --set-mark

> 20 iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p ALL -d 10.0.1.20 -j MARK 
> --set-mark 10 iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p ALL -j MARK 
> --set-mark 20 iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p ALL -d 10.0.1.21 -j 
> MARK --set-mark 10 iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p ALL -j MARK 
> --set-mark 20 iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p ALL -d 10.0.1.22 -j 
> MARK --set-mark 10
>
>
>
> This still does not solve the latency (or even seem to affect it, but 
> perhaps this is a better route in trying to solve this issue?)  Please

> let me know you thoughts,
Try this :

tc qdisc del dev ipsec0 root
tc qdisc add dev ipsec0 root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev
ipsec0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 600kbit ceil 600kbit tc class add
dev ipsec0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 240kbit ceil 600kbit tc
class add dev ipsec0 parent 1:2 classid 1:20 htb rate 400kbit ceil
500kbit tc filter add dev ipsec0 parent 1:0 prio 0 protocol ip handle
0x10 fw flowid 1:10 tc filter add dev ipsec0 parent 1:0 prio 0 protocol
ip handle 0x20 fw flowid 1:20 iptables -F -t mangle iptables -A
PREROUTING -t mangle -p ALL -d 10.0.1.20 -j MARK --set-mark 0x10
iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p ALL -d 10.0.1.21 -j MARK --set-mark
0x10 iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p ALL -d 10.0.1.22 -j MARK
--set-mark 0x10

10.1.1.20/21/22 are the VoIP systems ?

Stef

--
stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/