Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] imprecision in bandwidth measurement
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:10:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-107064432701707@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-107064353600414@msgid-missing>

On Friday 05 December 2003 17:51, Tilman Giese (Global View) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am experiencing a curious phenomenon. I limited the bandwidth for a
> specific client to 750KBit. It works well despite of the fact that the
> client always gets a little bit more bandwidth (around 770KBit to
> 780KBit). I used different bandwidth and traffic measurement tools like
> ntop, nettimer or ipac. All show the same, a little bit more bandwidth
> than allowed. The factor by which the specified bandwidth is increased
> seems to be proportional to the specified bandwidth. But where is the
> problem. Is it only a different way of traffic measurement or is this a
> bug? Maybe, does it depend on some command arguments to create the classes?
Can you post us your tc commands ?

Stef

-- 
stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-05 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-05 16:51 [LARTC] imprecision in bandwidth measurement Tilman Giese (Global View)
2003-12-05 17:10 ` Stef Coene [this message]
2003-12-05 17:23 ` Tilman Giese (Global View)
2003-12-05 18:17 ` Stef Coene
2003-12-05 19:44 ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-107064432701707@msgid-missing \
    --to=stef.coene@docum.org \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox