From: "Mike" <mike@superiorholidayadventures.ca>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [LARTC] Controlling only delay using HTB without stealing excess bandwidth
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:09:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-107151551812263@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-107150892502992@msgid-missing>
I disagree here. You can easily use IPTables to mark packets based on
just about anything (source/dest IP, MAC, source/dest port, etc). You
can then use those marks to assign traffic to the HTB classes you wish.
Mike Fetherston
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roy [mailto:roy@xxx.lt]
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 1:14 PM
> To: LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] Controlling only delay using HTB without stealing
> excess bandwidth
>
> htb is very primitive trafic managing system (if compare it with
ipatbles)
> because it was designed for high speed, and not quality
>
> Anyway it is not easy to make what you want because delay is the same
as
> priority
> so the first function is just side effect of second.
>
> There is no easy way to make what you want.
>
>
>
>
> Hi Gurus,
>
> The documentation isn't terribly clear, but it seems that the HTB
'prio'
> field has two separate functions:
> 1. Classes with lower prio get all the excess bandwidth first.
> 2. Classes with lower prio get lower delay.
>
> I want just #2 - and not #1
> In other words, for example lets say that I have a 100kbps link,
divided
> to classes A and B as following.
>
> A - rate kbps limit\x100kbps
> B - rate kbps limit\x100kbps
>
> How can I get class B to have a lower delay than A, while still
sharing
> the excess bandwidth fairly with A?
>
> Thanks,
> Aron Brand
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-15 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-15 17:18 [LARTC] Controlling only delay using HTB without stealing excess bandwidth Aron Brand
2003-12-15 18:14 ` Roy
2003-12-15 19:09 ` Mike [this message]
2003-12-16 7:53 ` [LARTC] Controlling only delay using HTB without stealing Cezar Atanasiu
2003-12-16 13:31 ` [LARTC] Controlling only delay using HTB without stealing excess bandwidth Roy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-107151551812263@msgid-missing \
--to=mike@superiorholidayadventures.ca \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox