From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Christian Worm Mortensen" <worm@dkik.dk>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:23:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] CBQ and WRR
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-98570671217544@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-98567886104582@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-98567886104582@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

> > The WRR qdisc mentioned in the howto has never been a part of the standard kernel.
> 
> Linux CBQ actually _does_ implement a WRR variant known as DRR (Deficit
> Round Robin). DRR is better than classical WRR. Read the Varghese paper
> to see the difference.

Yes, but in the howto also a qdisc named WRR is mentioned.

A quick search on Google BTW said that DRR is only better in terms of speed of the implementation but is worse in terms distribution bandwidth.


Christian


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/