From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramin Alidousti Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 20:35:38 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Why SFQ does not drops packets Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 11:23:46PM +0300, Serguei I. Ivantsov wrote: > Hello Ramin, > > Well, let's perfom a little calculation :) > > "tc -s class ls dev eth0" : > > > class cbq 10:200 parent 10:1 leaf 8026: rate 16Kbit (bounded,isolated) prio 5 > > Sent 4049872 bytes 3846 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 10286) > > borrowed 0 overactions 1364 avgidle 309677 undertime 0 > > after 4 second : > > > class cbq 10:200 parent 10:1 leaf 8026: rate 16Kbit (bounded,isolated) prio 5 > > Sent 4049926 bytes 3847 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 10286) > > rate 13bps > > borrowed 0 overactions 1364 avgidle 309677 undertime 0 > > 4049926(bytes)-4049872(bytes)T(bytes) > > 54(bytes)/4(second).5 BYTES PER SECOND! I agree. This is how the *throughput* is measured. What I meant was when you talk about Ethernet, Fast-Ethernet, Gig-Ethernet, TokenRing, DS3, OC3, OC48, OC192... all is expressed in bits/sec and that's the bandwidth. The throughput can be packets/sec or bytes/sec or bits/sec. Ramin > > It is easy to come to this conclusion when looking at MRTG graps. > > -- > Best regards, > Serguei mailto:admin@gsc-game.kiev.ua _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/