From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Wingtung.Leung" Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2001 00:40:31 +0000 Subject: Re: Re[2]: [LARTC] Why SFQ does not drops packets Message-Id: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org (Please send the the mailing list only .. ) On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Serguei I. Ivantsov wrote: > After number of tests I come to conclusion that the only queueing > discipline which can DROP packets and thereby throttle bandwith is > TBF. But it does not allow to throttle bandwith dynamically, does not > allow to relocate bandwith between classes:( > > Please put me right if I wrong. We use a setup without the TBF qdisc, and limit our traffic only using the rate parameter and seperate classes with cbq. So I think you are wrong. But I admit I don't have any good answer to your output. I will try to get you one early next week. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/