From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Wingtung.Leung" Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 17:20:08 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] priority of class Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Gery Kahn wrote: > I understand that "prio" optiion in tc class is useless > when you add cbq cause here you specifying to which kind > of QDISC your class connected, so can be CBQ, PRIO and etc. > kinds. I don't understand your three-line-long sentence. Please clarify what the exact problem is and give an example where the prio parameter would not have any effect. Don't add prio's before knowing what you want. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/