From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harry Kalogirou Subject: Re: ELKS not runnable.... (once again) Date: 17 May 2002 17:10:01 +0300 Sender: linux-8086-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1021644561.21840.3.camel@cool> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" To: Riley Williams Cc: Linux-8086 =D4=E7=ED =D0=E1=F1, 17-05-2002 =F3=F4=E9=F2 01:42, =EF/=E7 Riley Willi= ams =DD=E3=F1=E1=F8=E5:=20 s. >=20 > I don't understand it either. All I can be sure of is that th version > produced by `cvs get -r elks-0_1_0 elks` has exactly the same problem= , > but the one produced by `cvs get -D 'Apr 30 12:00:00 2002' elks` does > not, so the problem lies somewhere between those two versions. >=20 Why should we compare 0.1.0 with an older one? Concentrate on this fact= s 1) The bioshd block device fails because the FS tells it to read some _wild_ sector.=20 2) Replacing the minix FS sources in the current source code with the ones from the 0.1.0, fixes the problem.=20 3) The changes in the minix FS are very dangerous and require care.=20 Harry=20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-8086" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html