Re: ELKS not runnable.... (once again)

[Harry Kalogirou <harkal@gmx.net>]

Την Παρ, 17-05-2002 στις 20:59, ο/η Riley Williams έγραψε:
> Hi Harry.
> 
> >> I don't understand it either. All I can be sure of is that the
> >> version produced by `cvs get -r elks-0_1_0 elks` has exactly the
> >> same problem, but the one produced by `cvs get -D 'Apr 30 12:00:00
> >> 2002' elks` does not, so the problem lies somewhere between those
> >> two versions.
> 
> > Why should we compare 0.1.0 with an older one?
> 
> We're not - we're comparing the official 0.1.0 release (which is the
> version timestamped as above) with the tagged 0.1.0 release (which is
> the one tagged elks-0_1_0 in the CVS tree) and finding they differ.
> 
> My comment above is pointing out that the version tagged as elks-0_1_0
> in the CVS tree is NOT the version that was released as 0.1.0 but a
> later version with some extra tweaks applied.

If the tag elks-0_1_0 has the timestamp you say and you checkout that
timestamp and there are differences then CVS has some BUG, which I don't
think so.

> 
> Which 0.1.0 release? As stated above, there are TWO DIFFERENT releases
> labelled as 0.1.0 depending on where one looks.
>

I checked it out with the tag elks-0_1_0. 
 
> > 3) The changes in the minix FS are very dangerous and require care. 
> 
> Agreed. That's why I'm carefully reverting them.
> 

That is good to hear...

Harry



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-8086" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html