From: Harry Kalogirou <harkal@gmx.net>
To: jb1@btstream.com
Cc: Linux-8086 <linux-8086@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fork bug [WAS: Re: "mount" bug]
Date: 27 Oct 2002 21:49:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1035747909.8585.43.camel@cool> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210270416350.5872-100000@olympus.btstream.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1276 bytes --]
> On 26 Oct 2002, Harry Kalogirou wrote:
>
> > "Cannot fork" is emmited by the shell, when the fork() system call
> > fails. The system call will fail :
> >
> > 1) If there are no more process slots available.
> > 2) There is not enough free memory.
> >
> > What exacly happend there, I realy can't tell. The only thing I can tell
> > is that something "very" bad happed there. I personaly havedn't seen
> > ELKS behave like that before.
>
> There appears to be a bug in the "get_pid()" function from fork.c. The
> code fragment:
> if (++last_pid == 32768)
> last_pid = 1;
> must eventually fail because last_pid is declared as type pid_t, which is
> typedef'ed as __s16, which is in turn typedef'ed as signed short int.
> Since signed 16-bit numbers roll over from 32767 to negative numbers, they
> can never equal 32768. A possible fix might be:
> if ( (++last_pid && 0x7fff) == 0 )
> last_pid = 1;
> or, perhaps smaller and faster:
> if !( (last_pid++) &= 0x7fff )
> last_pid++;
> The latter may have superfluous parentheses because I'm not sure of the
> precedence, and whether "variable++" is smaller and faster than
> "++variable" is probably compiler-dependent.
>
Commited...
Harry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-27 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-25 9:28 "mount" bug jb1
2002-10-25 13:30 ` Harry Kalogirou
2002-10-26 8:55 ` jb1
2002-10-26 14:49 ` Harry Kalogirou
2002-10-27 12:57 ` fork bug [WAS: Re: "mount" bug] jb1
2002-10-27 19:49 ` Harry Kalogirou [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1035747909.8585.43.camel@cool \
--to=harkal@gmx.net \
--cc=jb1@btstream.com \
--cc=linux-8086@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox